The Monty Hall Problem

I heard of the Monty Hall Problem years ago, and believed that Marilyn vos Savant was full of crap. Today my friend Adam Dingle explained to me why she wasn't. It took me a long time to understand, and even longer to believe. But here's my explanation.

You have a 1/3 chance of picking the right door. Therefore you have a 2/3 chance of picking the wrong one. If you've guessed wrong, the host eliminates all but the winning door. This is true because he's promised that after you choose, he'll narrow it down to two doors, one of which contains the winner.

Thus, you now have two choices: stay with your original choice, which you knew had a 1/3 chance of being right; or switch to the other door, which must be the winning door if you earlier picked wrong.

Marilyn's million-door example is excellent, but she chose a rhetorical rather than clear explanation for it.

You have a one-in-a-million chance of picking the right door on the first guess. Then the host eliminates all but your pick and another door, one of which is the winner. If you stay, then you believe that you picked the winner on the first guess. If you switch, then you believe that you picked wrong, and are now switching to the winning one. It's much more likely you guessed wrong, forcing the host to reveal the winning door (since he had to make sure that the remaining two doors contained the winner).

The devilish part of this problem is that there are three doors, not a million. This means that the host eliminates only one door of the remaining two, so you don't realize that he's actually eliminating every remaining door that's a loser.

Categories

1 Comments

Bob P. said:

Mike, I clearly see that switching is the better move, but I don't understand why Marilyn says that you have 2/3 chance in winning if you switch.

Why don't you simply have a 1/2 chance if you switch, which is better than your original 1/3 chance and thus justifies switching.

In her example, does that mean that you have a 999,999/1,000,000 chance if she switches? I don't think so, she has a 1/2, which is still much better than a 1/1,000,000.

Why isn't the "Switch (the odds changed)" position correct?

Then again, you know me, and my IQ is MUCH lower than Marilyn's (but probably higher than those of Bill Ross and Rocco).

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Mike Tsao published on March 12, 2004 4:01 PM.

VS.Net's leak detector was the previous entry in this blog.

The 23 prisoners problem is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.2rc2-en